![]() If your NAS hardware isn’t capable or fast enough to transcode outgoing video, but is otherwise compatible with PMS, you can still enjoy a smooth experience by paying close attention to your playback devices and the media files you encode. In order to get adequate x86 silicon in a NAS, you’re likely going to be looking at high-end and expensive models. Other reasonably priced NAS devices may utilize Intel CPUs, but these CPUs are almost always older and slower parts that can’t keep up with real-time HD transcoding. These models can usually run PMS, but can’t do transcoding at all. Many NAS devices, unfortunately, especially consumer-grade models, feature ARM-based processors. As you can imagine, this requires a fair bit of computing horsepower, and an x86-based processor on top of that. So if you’ve elected to fill your media library with terabytes of lossless Blu-ray rips, PMS will seamlessly take care of making sure those files will play fine when streamed to your NVIDIA Shield tablet, for example. ![]() So why doesn’t everyone do this? The answer is that, despite the convenience offered by a NAS-based PMS solution, there is one huge drawback compared to dedicated PMS hardware: transcoding.Īs mentioned earlier, a fantastic feature of PMS is that it can automatically transcode content on the fly to suit the client device. With Plex on a NAS, you can store your media right on the NAS alongside the server software, and have everything run off of one relatively small package. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |